The Black Swan’s Nassim Taleb and the Nobel Committee

October 20th, 2010
| More
Contributed by: Aswath Damodaran
I just read this article, where Nassim Taleb, who seems to have taken on the mantle of the "anti-theorist" in finance, argues that the Nobel committee should be sued for giving the prize to Harry Markowitz, Bill Sharpe and Merton Miller (`Black Swan' Author Says Investors Should Sue Nobel for Crisis).

Nassim Taleb has written a few books, "Fooled by Randomness" and "The Black Swan", which have brought him acclaim and his warnings seem to have been borne out by the recent crises. (I have put down my thoughts about these books in an earlier post. ) I think he badly misplays his hand by arguing that Markowitz, Sharpe and Miller are to blame for the excesses in financial markets. In fact, let's take each of their contributions to finance and put them to the test:

a. Let's start with Merton Miller, who was the oddest target of all. (Perhaps, the story got the name wrong and Taleb really blamed Bob Merton, not Merton Miller...) Miller and Modigliani argued that great firms acquire that status by taking good investments (that generate higher returns than it costs them to raise capital), and that finessing capital structure or messing with dividend or buyback policy adds little or no value at the margin. Since much of the advice and deal making in Wall Street is directed towards capital structure solutions (recaps, leveraged transactions) and dividend policy (buybacks, special dividends), it would seem to me that what corporate finance departments at investment banks do is in direct violation of what Miller would have propounded.

b. How about Markowitz? The singular contribution to finance that Markowitz made to finance was his recognition that the risk in the investment has to be measured as the risk it adds to a portfolio rather than the risk of it standing alone. In effect, his work is a statistical proof that diversification eliminates a significant portion of risk in investments. It is true that he worked in a simplified world where an investment's worth is measured on only two dimension - the expected return (which is good) and standard deviation (which is bad), but his conclusion that diversification reduces risk would hold with any of the distributions that Taleb claims are more realistic descriptions of investment behavior. The mean-variance framework has been critiqued and adapted from within and without the discipline for forty years, starting with Mandelbrot in the 1960s and continuing through to the behavioral economists today. Perhaps, you can indirectly critique the dependence on the normal distribution for the failure of risk management systems such as VaR, but that is na stretch.

Page 1 of 2 Next >>
For Detailed Investor Profiles on these Investors, click below:
Universa Investments (Black Swan)
Related People: Mark Spitznagel; Nassim Taleb
Related Entities: Black Swan Fund; Black Swan Hedge Fund; Black Swan Protection Protocol Inflation Fund; Universa Asymmetry Fund LP; Universa Asymmetry Master Fund
Related Article Tags: Investment Management, Fund Manager and General Financial News; Featured Reports; Hedge Fund Resources and Featured Partner News

More Recent Headlines

Former Amaranth Advisors partner Manos Vourkoutiotis joins Nicholas Maounis’ Verition Fund Management

Deloitte unveils new emerging manager platform

Activist Update: Ramius extends Cypress Bioscience offer, Carl Icahn follows Seneca with active ownership stake in Dynergy

Fortress Investment Group’s credit head Peter Briger moves to San Francisco to open new office

Brevan Howard Asset Management plans IPO for BH Catalysts Fund

Clint Carlson’s Carlson Capital gains allocation from West Virginia

Eric Mandelblatt aims to launch Soroban Capital hedge fund with $500 million

Swiss Finish Sets New Standard for Global Bank Regulation

Donor Watch analysis of Wealthiest College Graduates identifies high potential targets for fundraisers

Brevan Howard Asset Management to launch to credit hedge fund in December